portland_katherine qa Jul 22, 2025

I'm a remote worker and Median household income is $128,105, which feels pretty solid for the area. With a population of 26,297, South Pasadena is a smaller city. The median home value here is around $1,545,100, which is pretty steep. The city has invested a lot in new development. Downtown has improved a lot in recent years. The food scene here is surprisingly good. The suburbs are where most families end up. Worth the trade-offs? Thanks! Public transit needs a lot of work honestly. Night life is decent if you know the right spots. Property taxes are high but you get good services. The parks and outdoor areas are a huge plus. Downtown has improved a lot in recent years. People here are genuinely friendly, not just surface-level. Downtown has improved a lot in recent years. Public transit needs a lot of work honestly. People here are genuinely friendly, not just surface-level. It's a very car-dependent city, for better or worse. The city has invested a lot in new development. Night life is decent if you know the right spots. The city has invested a lot in new development. I'd say it's better for families than young singles. Night life is decent if you know the right spots. There's a growing tech scene which is exciting. Night life is decent if you know the right spots. Cost of living is definitely rising, but still manageable. It's not perfect, but the community is solid. The parks and outdoor areas are a huge plus. The weather takes some getting used to. Night life is decent if you know the right spots. Honestly, I think it's a great place if you know where to look. The city has invested a lot in new development. There's a growing tech scene which is exciting. Property taxes are high but you get good services. Downtown has improved a lot in recent years. People here are genuinely friendly, not just surface-level. Night life is decent if you know the right spots. Property taxes are high but you get good services.

19 upvotes