Sign In Register

Least Dense in Lesser Poland

Top 52 cities ranked by least dense

Least Dense — Lesser Poland

1 Zawoja 160/mi²
2 Grzegórzki 215/mi²
3 Stryszawa 222/mi²
4 Bieńczyce 317/mi²
5 Piwniczna-Zdrój 392/mi²
6 Bukowno 444/mi²
7 Wieprz 462/mi²
8 Szczawnica 475/mi²
9 Klucze 552/mi²
10 Chocznia 612/mi²
11 Jordanów 640/mi²
12 Osiek 665/mi²
13 Mszana Dolna 717/mi²
14 Maków Podhalański 742/mi²
15 Krynica-Zdrój 791/mi²
16 Zakopane 841/mi²
17 Niepołomice 897/mi²
18 Grybów 917/mi²
19 Sucha Beskidzka 925/mi²
20 Rabka-Zdrój 925/mi²
21 Tuchów 953/mi²
22 Sułkowice 1,000/mi²
23 Dobczyce 1,232/mi²
24 Dąbrowa Tarnowska 1,267/mi²
25 Libiąż 1,288/mi²
26 Muszyna 1,398/mi²
27 Brzeszcze 1,478/mi²
28 Myślenice 1,522/mi²
29 Krzeszowice 1,535/mi²
30 Stary Sącz 1,547/mi²
31 Trzebinia 1,559/mi²
32 Nowy Targ 1,712/mi²
33 Miechów 1,751/mi²
34 Limanowa 2,008/mi²
35 Kęty 2,156/mi²
36 Proszowice 2,211/mi²
37 Wolbrom 2,339/mi²
38 Bochnia 2,529/mi²
39 Chrzanów 2,725/mi²
40 Chełmek 2,822/mi²
41 Oświęcim 2,921/mi²
42 Skawina 2,986/mi²
43 Sulęcin 3,048/mi²
44 Gorlice 3,144/mi²
45 Wieliczka 3,606/mi²
46 Brzesko 3,723/mi²
47 Olkusz 3,813/mi²
48 Nowy Sącz 3,834/mi²
49 Wadowice 3,840/mi²
50 Tarnów 4,215/mi²
51 Andrychów 5,530/mi²
52 Kraków 6,370/mi²

The least densely populated cities in Lesser Poland offer spacious living with more land per resident. Zawoja has just 160 people per square mile. These cities provide room to spread out with larger lot sizes and more open space.

Low-density cities typically feature more single-family homes with larger yards, easier parking, and less traffic congestion. They appeal to families seeking space, privacy, and access to nature without moving to a fully rural area.

While the spread-out nature of these cities means longer drives to amenities and greater reliance on personal vehicles, many residents value the trade-off for quieter neighborhoods and a more relaxed pace of life.

Did You Know?

  • 1. In Zawoja, there are only 160 people per square mile — each resident has roughly 174,109 square feet of city space.
  • 2. Low-density cities often have significantly lower housing costs due to more available land for development.
  • 3. Many of the least dense cities are located in the western United States, where vast open spaces define the landscape.

Browse Rankings by Region

Poland — By Region

Greater Poland Kujawsko-Pomorskie Lesser Poland Lower Silesia Lublin Lubusz Łódź Voivodeship Mazovia Opole Voivodeship Podlasie Pomerania Silesia Subcarpathia Świętokrzyskie Warmia-Masuria West Pomerania

By Country

Afghanistan Albania Algeria Angola Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bangladesh Belarus Belgium Benin Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Estonia Ethiopia Finland France Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Guadeloupe Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Mali Malta Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova Mongolia Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nepal New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Korea North Macedonia Norway Oman Pakistan Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Republic of the Congo Reunion Romania Russia Rwanda Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Somalia South Africa South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Netherlands Togo Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe