Most Dense in Latvia

Top 43 cities ranked by most dense

Most Dense - Latvia

1 Riga 25 6,028/mi²
2 Bolderaja 25 4,587/mi²
3 Olaine A2 3,629/mi²
4 Ogre 21 3,600/mi²
5 Salaspils C3 3,056/mi²
6 Valmiera 31 3,045/mi²
7 Tukums 29 3,042/mi²
8 Līvāni 90 2,958/mi²
9 Talsi 28 2,851/mi²
10 Preiļi 22 2,834/mi²
11 Daugavpils 06 2,796/mi²
12 Balvi 03 2,792/mi²
13 Dobele 08 2,728/mi²
14 Liepāja 16 2,542/mi²
15 Daugavgrīva 25 2,539/mi²
16 Baloži 80 2,471/mi²
17 Jēkabpils 10 2,445/mi²
18 Saldus 27 2,434/mi²
19 Bauska 04 2,392/mi²
20 Jelgava 11 2,327/mi²
21 Saulkrasti C5 2,250/mi²
22 Mārupe 95 2,154/mi²
23 Cēsis 05 2,064/mi²
24 Limbaži 18 1,991/mi²
25 Rēzekne 23 1,990/mi²
26 Ādaži 34 1,897/mi²
27 Krāslava 14 1,886/mi²
28 Sigulda C7 1,729/mi²
29 Ludza 19 1,660/mi²
30 Madona 20 1,605/mi²
31 Lielvārde 21 1,544/mi²
32 Jūrmala 13 1,541/mi²
33 Gulbene 09 1,453/mi²
34 Ikšķile 21 1,404/mi²
35 Aizkraukle 01 1,328/mi²
36 Kuldīga 15 1,302/mi²
37 Alūksne 02 1,108/mi²
38 Ventspils 32 1,012/mi²
39 Iecava 04 983/mi²
40 Krustpils 10 525/mi²
41 Karosta 16 212/mi²
42 Dārzciems 25 130/mi²
43 Mežciems 25 95/mi²

The most densely populated cities in Latvia pack the most residents per square mile, creating vibrant urban environments with walkable neighborhoods and extensive public transit. Riga leads with 6,028 people per square mile.

High population density is often associated with better access to public transportation, more walkable streets, and a wider variety of restaurants, shops, and entertainment options within close proximity. These cities tend to have lower car ownership rates and shorter commute distances.

Dense cities face unique challenges including higher housing costs, limited parking, and potential overcrowding in public spaces. However, they also tend to have lower per-capita carbon footprints due to shared infrastructure and reduced driving.

Did You Know?

  • 1. Riga has 6,028 people per square mile - that's roughly 9 people per acre.
  • 2. Dense cities tend to have the most walkable neighborhoods and lowest car ownership rates in the country.
  • 3. Urban density can reduce per-capita carbon emissions by up to 50% compared to suburban sprawl.

Browse Rankings by Region

Latvia - By Region

Riga

By Country

Afghanistan Albania Algeria Angola Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bangladesh Belarus Belgium Benin Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Estonia Ethiopia Finland France Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Guadeloupe Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Mali Malta Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova Mongolia Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nepal New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Korea North Macedonia Norway Oman Pakistan Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Republic of the Congo Reunion Romania Russia Rwanda Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Somalia South Africa South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Netherlands Togo Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe