Most Dense in Slovenia

Top 40 cities ranked by most dense

Most Dense - Slovenia

1 Maribor J2 7,221/mi²
2 Velenje D7 5,192/mi²
3 Koper 50 5,162/mi²
4 Ljubljana 61 4,496/mi²
5 Celje 11 4,233/mi²
6 Jesenice H4 4,041/mi²
7 Kamnik H6 3,932/mi²
8 Grosuplje 32 3,758/mi²
9 Lucija J9 3,545/mi²
10 Litija I5 3,262/mi²
11 Radovljica A3 3,227/mi²
12 Krško 54 2,953/mi²
13 Ajdovščina 01 2,534/mi²
14 Murska Sobota 80 2,068/mi²
15 Brežice 08 1,989/mi²
16 Novo Mesto J7 1,881/mi²
17 Ptuj K7 1,806/mi²
18 Kočevje H7 1,493/mi²
19 Mengeš 72 1,346/mi²
20 Vrhnika E5 1,229/mi²
21 Črnomelj 17 1,104/mi²
22 Izola 40 1,041/mi²
23 Postojna 94 747/mi²
24 Kranj 52 658/mi²
25 Logatec 64 640/mi²
26 Trbovlje D3 613/mi²
27 Domžale G7 474/mi²
28 Šentilj v Slov. Goricah B3 333/mi²
29 Ravne na Koroškem K8 301/mi²
30 Škofja Loka B9 211/mi²
31 Medvode 71 154/mi²
32 Slovenske Konjice C4 137/mi²
33 Žalec N5 111/mi²
34 Nova Gorica 84 109/mi²
35 Slovenj Gradec C2 108/mi²
36 Zagorje ob Savi E7 106/mi²
37 Kanal 44 94/mi²
38 Sežana B7 72/mi²
39 Slovenska Bistrica L8 64/mi²
40 Idrija 36 52/mi²

The most densely populated cities in Slovenia pack the most residents per square mile, creating vibrant urban environments with walkable neighborhoods and extensive public transit. Maribor leads with 7,221 people per square mile.

High population density is often associated with better access to public transportation, more walkable streets, and a wider variety of restaurants, shops, and entertainment options within close proximity. These cities tend to have lower car ownership rates and shorter commute distances.

Dense cities face unique challenges including higher housing costs, limited parking, and potential overcrowding in public spaces. However, they also tend to have lower per-capita carbon footprints due to shared infrastructure and reduced driving.

Did You Know?

  • 1. Maribor has 7,221 people per square mile - that's roughly 11 people per acre.
  • 2. Dense cities tend to have the most walkable neighborhoods and lowest car ownership rates in the country.
  • 3. Urban density can reduce per-capita carbon emissions by up to 50% compared to suburban sprawl.

Browse Rankings by Region

By Country

Afghanistan Albania Algeria Angola Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bangladesh Belarus Belgium Benin Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Estonia Ethiopia Finland France Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Guadeloupe Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Mali Malta Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova Mongolia Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nepal New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Korea North Macedonia Norway Oman Pakistan Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Republic of the Congo Reunion Romania Russia Rwanda Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Somalia South Africa South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Netherlands Togo Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe