Sign In Register

Most Dense in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Top 48 cities ranked by most dense

Most Dense — Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

1 Peshawar 9,805/mi²
2 Mansehra 5,150/mi²
3 Bannu 5,083/mi²
4 Dera Ismail Khan 2,820/mi²
5 Battagram 2,673/mi²
6 Mardan 1,231/mi²
7 Tordher 1,081/mi²
8 Mingora 1,070/mi²
9 Abbottabad 1,047/mi²
10 Kohat 571/mi²
11 Charsadda 456/mi²
12 Jahangira 411/mi²
13 Topi 378/mi²
14 Swabi 369/mi²
15 Nowshera Cantonment 367/mi²
16 Nowshera Kalan 333/mi²
17 Havelian 283/mi²
18 Pabbi 256/mi²
19 Shabqadar 253/mi²
20 Shorkot 249/mi²
21 Buni 216/mi²
22 Haripur 216/mi²
23 Dursh Khela 215/mi²
24 Tangi 177/mi²
25 Amangarh 160/mi²
26 Khalabat 148/mi²
27 Risalpur Cantonment 137/mi²
28 Utmanzai 130/mi²
29 Bat Khela 119/mi²
30 Upper Dir 115/mi²
31 Hangu 110/mi²
32 Zaida 102/mi²
34 Khar 68/mi²
35 Inzari 68/mi²
36 Akora Khattak 67/mi²
37 Thal 56/mi²
38 Baffa 49/mi²
39 Batwar Salarzai 47/mi²
40 Tank 45/mi²
41 Kulachi 35/mi²
42 Doaba 28/mi²
43 Lakki 24/mi²
44 Lachi 21/mi²
45 Paharpur 16/mi²
46 Sarai Naurang 13/mi²
47 Karak 11/mi²
48 Abdul Khel 8/mi²

The most densely populated cities in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa pack the most residents per square mile, creating vibrant urban environments with walkable neighborhoods and extensive public transit. Peshawar leads with 9,805 people per square mile.

High population density is often associated with better access to public transportation, more walkable streets, and a wider variety of restaurants, shops, and entertainment options within close proximity. These cities tend to have lower car ownership rates and shorter commute distances.

Dense cities face unique challenges including higher housing costs, limited parking, and potential overcrowding in public spaces. However, they also tend to have lower per-capita carbon footprints due to shared infrastructure and reduced driving.

Did You Know?

  • 1. Peshawar has 9,805 people per square mile — that's roughly 15 people per acre.
  • 2. Dense cities tend to have the most walkable neighborhoods and lowest car ownership rates in the country.
  • 3. Urban density can reduce per-capita carbon emissions by up to 50% compared to suburban sprawl.

Browse Rankings by Region

Pakistan — By Region

Azad Kashmir Balochistan Gilgit-Baltistan Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Punjab Sindh

By Country

Afghanistan Albania Algeria Angola Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bangladesh Belarus Belgium Benin Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Estonia Ethiopia Finland France Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Guadeloupe Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Ivory Coast Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Mali Malta Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova Mongolia Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nepal New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Korea North Macedonia Norway Oman Pakistan Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Republic of the Congo Reunion Romania Russia Rwanda Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Somalia South Africa South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Netherlands Togo Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe